Independent verification scores, services, tools, pricing, and team details for Evestar and Figmatica side by side.
Evestar and Figmatica are both verified AI-native design studios on StudioRank. Evestar holds a verification score of 65/100, 40 points ahead of Figmatica at 25/100.
Both studios offer Full-Stack Dev and Web Design. They differ on 3 other services between them.
Evestar has the stronger AI-integration evidence on paper, but the right pick depends on scope and budget, not score alone.
Pick Evestar if the deeper AI integration is the deciding factor, or you specifically need ai strategy.
Pick Figmatica if your scope includes product design or brand/identity.
This verdict is generated from independently verified data on both studios - verification score, team size, budget bands, and service mix. It reflects the evidence on file, not editorial preference.
Get matched with the right studio based on your budget, timeline, and project requirements. It takes about two minutes.
Match each studio against your brief. For a structured pick, run our two-minute matchmaker, which scores both against your budget, timeline, and tool requirements before recommending one.
Evestar scores 65/100 on AI verification, 40 points ahead of Figmatica at 25/100. The score reflects tool stack evidence, workflow integration signals in case studies, and portfolio output, not self-reported AI claims.
Both offer Web Design, Full-Stack Dev. Evestar additionally lists AI Strategy. Figmatica additionally lists Product Design, Brand/Identity.
| AI Strategy |
| Brand/Identity |
| Full-Stack Dev |
| Product Design |
| Web Design |
